Philosophical hermeneutics and its origins in Xenocrates of Athens
Part of : Philosophical inquiry ; Vol.39, No.2, 2015, pages 35-48
Issue:
Pages:
35-48
Author:
Abstract:
Xenocrates of Athens (or of Sikyon) was a sculptor and theoretician of the 3rd cen. B.C., whose now lost writings were used as basic sources by Pliny the Elder in his 34th and 35th Books of Natural History, about Sculpture and Painting respectively. It is strongly believed that the progressive model of the development of art in both books has Xenocratian origins: influenced by the tradition of Democritus, Xenocrates had explained the evolution of art as a process of resolution of artistic problems. His narrative was, though, a descriptive one without a theoretical or philosophical background. A similar case had prevailed in the Historiography of Art for many centuries, up to the beginnings of the 20th cen., when the rise of Philosophical Hermeneutics changed the picture. Art Historians began to create theories and methods trying for the first time to explain at a theoretical level the phenomena both of the development of art and of the capability of later perceivers to understand previous artworks and their changes through time. Ernst Gombrich's theory that combines modern and postmodern ideas is to be understood as influenced both by the Xenocratian idea that there is always an innovative person who first overcomes traditional methods triggering the progress of art's development and by the Popperian notion of "trial and error" as the main schema for the development of science.
Subject:
Subject (LC):
References (1):
- Antal Fr. (1948), Florentine Painting and Its Social Background London: Kegan PaulBal M. (1991), Reading Rembrandt, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressBaxandall M. (1972), Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy, Gloucestershire: Clarendon PressD'Alleva A. (2005), Methods & Theories of Art History, London: Laurence King PublishingFernie E. (2005), Art History and its Methods. A Critical Anthology, New York: PhaidonFreud (2001), Leonardo da Vinci, trans. By Alan Dyson, London and New York: Routledge ClassicsFreud, "Der Moses des Michelangelo". Imago, 3/1 (Febr. 1914), 15-36.Gombrich E.H. (1967, 1994), "In Search of Cultural History", the Philip Maurice Deneke Lecture delivered at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford; repr. In Ideals and Idols: Essays on Values in History and in Art, Oxford, pp. 42-59Gombrich E.H. (1972), Symbolic Images: Studies in the Art of the Renaissance, London: PhaidonGombrich E.H.(1977),"The Father of Art History": a Reading of the Lectures on Aesthetics of G.W.F Hegel (1770-1831), in Tributes: Interpreters of our Cultural Tradition, Oxford, pp. 51-69Gombrich E.H. (2002), Art and Illusion. A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, London: PhaidonHatt M. & Klonk Ch. (2006), Art History. A Critical Introduction to its Methods, Manchester and New York: Manchester University PressHauser Ar. (1951) The Social History of Art, London: Routledge.Hegel G.W.H. [1835] (1975), Aesthetics. Lectures on Fine Art, vol.2, trans. By T.M.Knox, Oxford: Clarendon PressKrauss R. (1985), "In the Name of Picasso", in: The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Kultermann, U. (1996), Geschichte der Kunstgeschichte, München: Prestel Verlag Levidis A. (Introd., Cr. Not., Ed. In Greek) - T.Roussos & A.Levidis (trans.) (1998), Plinius the Elder, On Ancient Greek Painting. The 35th Book of Natural History, Athens: AgraPanofsky (1927), Perspective as Symbolic Form, London: PhaidonPanofsky Er. (2008), "On the Relationship of Art History and Art Theory: Towards the Possibility of a Fundamental System of Concepts for a Science of Art», Critical Inquiry, vol.35, noi, pp.43-71Pfuhl E. (1923), Malerei und Zeichnung der Griechen, vol.1, Munich: BruckmannPodro M. (1982), The Critical Historians of Art, New Heaven and London: Yale University PressPollitt J.J. ( 1974) The Ancient View of Greek Art. Criticism, History, and Terminology, New Heaven: Yale University PressPopper, K. R. (1934, 1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson and Co.Popper K.R. (1960, 1989), "Truth, Rationality and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge", Conjectures and Refutations: the Growth of Scientific Knowledge, London, New York: Routledge (5th ed.)Richmond S.S. (1994), Aesthetic Criteria: Gombrich and the Philosophies of Science of Popper and Polanyi, Amsterdam: RodopiSchweitzer B. (1932), „Xenokrates von Athen", in: Schriften der Königsberger Gesellschaft, Geisteswissenschaftliche Klasse IX, 1, Halle.Shapiro M. (1969), "On Some Problems in the Semiotics of Visual Art: Field and Vehicle in Image-Signs" Semiotica, I, 1969, 223-242Shapiro M. (1973), Words and Pictures: On the Literal and the Symbolic in the Illustration of a Text, The Hague: MoutonWölfflin H. (1932[1915]), Principles of Art History: The Problem of the Development of Style in Later Art, trans. M.D.Hottinger, London: George BellWoodfield R. (2008), "Gombrich and Panofsky on Iconology", International Yearbook of Aesthetics, Volume 12, 151 -164
