The Loupe : Tangible Augmented Reality for learning to look at ancient Greek art
Part of : Mediterranean archaeology & archaeometry : international journal ; Vol.16, No.5, 2016, pages 73-85
Issue:
Pages:
73-85
Abstract:
With the advent of digital museum interactives as a widely available learning offer in all types of museums, including history of art and archaeology museums, an ongoing debate has been established: Do these -usually screen-based - museum interactives assist visitors in focusing on museum objects and artefacts? Or do they distract and take away the attention from the real museum objects on display? We present the Loupe, a tangible Augmented Reality prototype in form of a magnifying lens, which allows museum visitors to get information in context about museum artefacts. We detail the design and content creation process that was employed in order to create a thematic tour for the Greek Gallery of Allard Pierson Museum in Amsterdam. An evaluation study with 22 adult participants was carried out, using both qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods, so as to explore the utility and usability of the Loupe as well its learning and affective impact. Our findings suggest that the acceptance of the Loupe as a museum interactive and learning resource, was related both with its qualities as a tangible as well as with the structure of the content and the narratives revealed.
Subject:
Subject (LC):
Keywords:
Augmented Reality, Tangible Interaction, User Experience, Museum Visit, Evaluation, Emotions, Learning
Notes:
Περιέχει 1 εικόνα και 1 πίνακα
References (1):
- Astic, I., Aunis, C., Damala, A., and Gressier-Soudan, E. (2011) A Ubiquitous mobile edutainment application for learning science through play. Museum and the Web, Archives & Museum Informatics, Toronto, available at http://conference.archimuse.com/mw2011/papers/ubiquitous_mobile_entertainment_application_learning_sciencAdams, M., Luke, J., and Moussouri, T. (2004) Interactivity: Moving Beyond Terminology. Curator 74, 2. 155-170.Bannon, L., Benford, S., Bowers, J., and Heath, C. (2005) Hybrid design creates innovative museum experiences. Communications of the ACM 48, 3. 62-65.Bitgood, S.C. and Patterson, D.D. (1993) The effects of gallery changes on visitor reading and object viewing time, Environment and Behavior, 25 (6), 761-781.Bitgood, S. (2000) The Role of Attention in Designing Effective Interpretive labels, Journal of Interpretation Research, 5 (2), 31-45.Bitgood, S., & Thompson, D. (1987). How do people perceive museums, parks, and zoos. Visitor Behavior, 2(3), 9-10.Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikzentmihaly, M. (1991) Flow: The psychology of optimal experience (Vol. 41). New York: HarperPerennial.Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hermanson, K. (1999). Intrinsic Motivation in Museums: Why does one want to learn? In Hooper-Greenhill, E. (Ed), The Educational Role of the Museum, London & New York: Routledge, 146-160.Ciolfi, L., Avram, G., Maye, L., Dulake, N., Marshall, M. T., van Dijk, D., & McDermott, F. (2016, February). Articulating Co-Design in Museums: Reflections on Two Participatory Processes. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 13-25). ACM Press, New York.Damala, A., Cubaud, P., Bationo, A., Houlier, P. and Marchal, I. (2008) Bridging the gap between the digital and the physical: design and evaluation of a mobile augmented reality guide for the museum visit. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, ACM Press, New York, 120-127.Damala, A. & Stojanovic, N. (2012) Tailoring the Adaptive Augmented Reality (A 2 R) museum visit: Identifying Cultural Heritage professionals' motivations and needs. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-AMH), IEEE, 71-80.Damala, A. (2009) Interaction Design and Evaluation of Mobile Guides for the Museum Visit: A Case Study in Multimedia and Mobile Augmented Reality, PhD Thesis, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Paris.Damala, A. (2014) An introduction to Augmented Reality and cultural heritage for curators, art historians and museum educators, La Cocina valenciana del Museo Nacional de Artes Decorativas: Una relectura a través de la tecnologiade Realidad Aumentada, Cabrera Lafuente, A., Rodriguez Marco, I. and Villar Frenandez C.V.F., (Eds.) Madrid, 2013, pp. 120-133.Damasio, A. R. (2006). Descartes' error. Random House.Diamond, J. (1999) Practical evaluation guide: Tools for museums and other informal educational settings. Rowman Altamira.Díaz, P., Aedo, I. and van der Vaart, M. (2015) Engineering the Creative Co-design of Augmented Digital Experiences with Cultural Heritage, IS-EUD 2015, End-User Development. Springer International Publishing, 42-57.Donald, J. G. (1991). The measurement of learning in the museum. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 371-382.Dewey, J. (1913) Interest and effort in education. Houghton Mifflin.Dierking, L. D. (2005) Museums, affect, and cognition: The view from another window. Beyond Cartesian Dualism, Springer, Netherlands, 111-122.Economou, M. (2010) The evaluation of museum multimedia applications. In: Ross Parry. Museums in a digital Age. Readers in museum studies. 391-405.Ekarv, M. (1999) Combating redundancy: Writing texts for exhibitions. In Hooper-Greenhill, E. (Ed), The Educational Role of the Museum, London & New York: Routledge, 201-204.Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000) Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Altamira PressFalk, J. H., Needham, M. D., Dierking, L. D., & Prendergast, L. (2014). International science centre impact study. Final report. Corvallis, Oregon.Gibson, J. J. (1977) The theory of affordances. Hilldale, USA.Grinter, R. E., Aoki, P. M., Szymanski, M. H., Thornton, J. D., Woodruff, A., and Hurst, A. (2002) Revisiting the visit:: understanding how technology can shape the museum visit. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM Press, NY, 146-155.Hassenzahl, M. (2008) User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine, ACM Press, NY, 11-15.Hooper‐Greenhill, E. (2004) Measuring learning outcomes in museums, archives and libraries: The Learning Impact Research Project (LIRP). International Journal of Heritage Studies, 10(2), 151-174.Horn, Michael S. (2013) The role of cultural forms in tangible interaction design. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. ACM Press, New York, 117-124.Hornecker, E. (2012) Beyond affordance: tangibles' hybrid nature. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '12), Stephen N. Spencer (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 175-182.Hornecker, E and Stifter. M. (2006) Learning from Interactive Museum Installations About Interaction Design for Public Settings. Proceedings of OzCHI 2006. ACM Press, NY, 135-142.Hsi, S. (2003) A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 308-319.ICOM (2007), ICOM Statutes, ICOM Internal Rules and Regulation, Article 3, Section 1, Approved in Vienna, Austria, August 24, 2007. Available at http://archives.icom.museum/statutes.html#2.Macleod, M. (2013) The right place for interactivity. Museums & Heritage magazine, summer, 42-43.Norman, D. A. (2004) Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic books, New York.O'Malley, C. and Stanton Fraser, D. (2004). "Literature review in learning with tangible technologies."Perry, D. L. (1993) Beyond cognition and affect: The anatomy of a museum visit. Visitor studies: Theory, research and practice: Collected papers from the 1993 Visitor Studies Conference (Vol. 6, pp. 43-47).Petrelli, D., Not, E., Damala, A., van Dijk, D., & Lechner, M. (2014). meSch–Material Encounters with Digital Cultural Heritage. In Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation and Protection Springer International Publishing, 536-545.Petrie, H., & Harrison, C. (2009) Measuring users' emotional reactions to websites. CHI'09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, New York, 3847-3852.Pujol-Tost, L. (2011) Integrating ICT in exhibitions. Museum Management and Curatorship Volume: 26, Issue: 1. 63-79.Rounds, J. (2004) Strategies for the curiosity-driven museum visitor. Curator, 47(4), 389-412.Van der Vaart, M. and Damala A. (2015) Through the Loupe: Visitors Engagement with a Primarily Text-Based Handheld AR Application, Proceedings of the Digital Heritage International Congress, IEEE, 553-560.vom Lehn, D. and Heath, C. (2003) Displacing the object: mobile technology and interpretive resources. In ICHIM - International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meeting.Vom Lehn, D. and Heath, C., 2005. Accounting for new technology in museum exhibitions. International Journal of Arts Management, pp.11-21.Yusoff, Y. M., Ruthven, I., & Landoni, M. (2011) The fun semantic differential scales. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM Press, New York, 221-224.