205-232

Wall Paintings in St. Catherine's Monastery on Mount Sinai (pl. 71-84)

Articles

• Χατζηδάκης, Μανώλης
• ΧΑΤΖΗΔΑΚΗΣ, Μανόλης

Two wall paintings have been discovered in recent years in the Monastery by the Greek Mission of the Archaeological Service, which hasworked in Sinai on the restoration of the Icons (1962-1967). In 1962, acomplete composition was revealed by the Greek restorers under a darkthick varnish in the Sanctuary of St. James' chapel in the main church,and in 1967 a painted niche was discovered in a kind of a small chapelformed in a hollow on the south side of the north outer wall of the Monastery at a height of three meters. These well preserved fresco paintings— rare in the Sinaitic Monastery—provide evidence that a Sinaiticworkshop existed and worked at this place at a precise period of time.After a specific investigation in Sinai and in the Photographical Archivesof the Sinai material in Athens and in Princeton (note 2) it has beenpossible to attribute a number of more than a hundred Icons of the Monastery to the same workshop.a) St. James' Chapel (pi. 71 - 75).The scene represents the Virgin as the Burning Bush in the midst ofSt. Basil and John Chrysostom, St. James and Moses. All f've figuresare standing in frontal positions. Above them an imposing bust of Christstands out of the semicircular sky and awards a precious book to St. James and the Tablets of the Law to Moses (pi. 71 -75). This well orderedcompositional scheme derives from earlier apsis decorations (Bawît, SanVenanzio in Rome — 7th century — note 5), but its specific iconographicalfeatures are purely Sinaitic : the depiction of the Virgin in the BurningBush, which appears here as an isolated fully developed iconical type,not encountered before the 13th century (notes 6-7, 12-16), Moses withthe Tablets of the Law received on Mount Sinai, the two fathers of theChurch, to whom a chapel was dedicated in the area of the Monastery(notes 17- 18). The well balanced distribution of the awards of Christ toone personage of the New and another of the Old Testament, as well asthe anachronism in the immediate connection of Christ and Moses are tobe noticed. Both features are rare but not unknown in the iconography ofthat time. In general, the attitude of the immobile, frontally standing figures give a strong monumental character to the whole composition, a feature which is typical of the Middle Byzantine painting, particularly in the early 13th century. It is clear that the Sinaitic painter, working on themesand motives of the usual Orthodox language, has followed a local iconographical tradition, specimens of which exist in the numerous portableSinaitic icons (notes 8-11).b) The Wall Chapel (pi. 76 - 80).The whole painting which covers the niche has the measurements ofa portable icon (63 X 65 cm), and represents a bust of the Virgin in theOdigitria type which covers the flat back wall of the niche, surroundedby nine medallions each containing a bust of two archangels, the prophets Moses, Elijah, Aaron and Elisha and Sts. John of the Climax andCatherine. The top medallion contains an X ( = Χριστός). It is clear thatthe selection of the figures accompanying the Virgin is purely Sinaitic(note 19).The technical and stylistic features of both wall paintings are closelyinterconnected, so that these could easily be attributed to the same localworkshop. The manner of rendering the strong plasticity of the figureswith light green shadows and large warm ochre cheeks, the lighting withsoft white strokes diffused on the surface (in painterly manner), theloose treatement of the wide and in a way inelegant but rythmicallyformed draperies, are common features to both mural scenes, as wellas in a number of portable icons.The origin of these characteristics is not difficult to localise in thepaintings of the Palaeologan era. To these can be added the golden nimbus and a kind of sphericity of heads (pi. 75,1), which can find parallelsin paintings of the first half of the 15th century (Gregory Palamas wallpainting) in Agios-Demetrius in Salonica, wall paintings in Resava (note33 - 34). We can also add the hanging veils painted on either side of theVirgin in the Wall Chapel (pi. 76, notes 20 and 26). On the other hand,the figure in itself of the Virgin is related to icons of the Macedonianregion of the first half of the 15th century (notes 23-25).However the important point is the discovery of the precise prototypes of our figures amongst the vast Sinai collection of icons. This pointof view can be supported by more than one example, but the large unpublished Icon of Sts. Peter and Paul on either side of St. Andrew canserve as capital evidence : the middle figure of Andrew is painted over,covering the original figure of St. Theodosius the Coenobiarch (pi. 81).The original icon can be dated to the 12th century, but the new figure ofAndrew is closely related to our group (pi. 74, 1 and 82). It is clear however that the intention was to imitate as far as possible the figures of Peter and Paul. To the same group we can attribute, among other, a series ofeight unpublished panels representing the apostles Mark and James,the Brother of God (pi. 83,1 - 2) and six Bishops, all standing in theposition of celebrating the mass. One can suppose, on reasonable grounds,that this set was originally made in order to decorate the iconostasis ofSt. James'Chapel, at the same date and by the same painters who decorated the apsis.The stylistic analysis of the draperies proves that the immediate prototypes for these paintings can be some icons of the 11th and 12th centuries existing in the Monastery (notes 30-31), chosen in an eclectic mannerand executed with the typical features of our group. On the other hand,from the point of view of portraiting, only a restricted number of types isused, the same in both wall paintings and icons. These placid faces aredistinguished by a lack of vitality, of nobility and of spirituality. This andother features clearly distinguish the work attributed here to the Sinaiticworkshop from the presumed prototypes. There is a clear difference between these wall paintings and icons and the pure Palaeologan or olderpieces in which exist some connections mentioned above (note 33). This isimportant from the chronological point of view. Some comparisons withworks of the second half of the 15'h century, as the wall paintings in thePedoula Monastery (1474) or in Galata (1514), both in Cyprus (note 36),as well as with some wall paintings in Castoria (note 37), will convince usthat the Sinaitic workshop was active (in a general way) during the secondhalf of the 15th century. However, it is difficult to be more precise in theactual progression of our research as to the location of the proveniance ofthis workshop, as well as to the probable evolution of its style and technique.In summarising the importance and the character of the now definedSinaitic workshop of the late 15th century, it may be said that theacquaintance of two so far unknown wall paintings and the consecutivedefinition of a local workshop, add a new important chapter to the arthistory of this ancient sacred place. The historical evidence is favourableto this point of view, while this precise period of the decline of ByzantineHellenism and Orthodoxy is proved to be a time of economical prosperityof this Greek community lost in the Sinaitic desert, due to its immense prestige in the eyes of Christianity of the West (note 38). From another point ofview the projected publication of the whole material concerning this matter(note 3) will be an important contribution to the study of the problems of postByzantine painting, during the first period after the fall of Constantinople.

• Arts
• History and Archaeology

• Arts and religion

• http://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/deltion/article/view/4513
• http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/dchae.816