Some non-revisionist solutions to some semantic antinomies
Part of : Philosophical inquiry ; Vol.37, No.3-4, 2013, pages 51-61
Issue:
Pages:
51-61
Author:
Subject (LC):
References (1):
- Barwise, Jon and Perry, John. 1983. Semantic innocence and uncompromising situations. In: Martinich, A.P. (Ed.), The Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 392-404.Brown, Bryson (2006). “On Paraconsistency." In Jacquette, Dale. A Companion to Philosophical Logic. New York: Blackwell, pp. 628-650.Cargile, James. 1980. Paradoxes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Dummett, Michael. 1973. Frege: Philosophy of Language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Frege, Gottlob. 1892. “On Sense and Nominatum." In: Martinich, A.P. (Ed.), The Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 190-202.Godel, Kurt. 1953. “Is Mathematics Syntax of Language.” Lecture manuscript. Printed in Godel 1995. pp. 334-356.Kaplan, David , 1975. Dthat. In: Martinich, A.P. (Ed.), The Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 316-329.Kaplan, David. 1979. On the Logic of Demonstratives. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8,71-98.Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In: Almog, J., et al.(Eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, NewYork, pp. 471-555.Kaplan, David. 1989b. Afterthoughts. In: Almog, J., et al. (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 557-534.Long, Peter. 2001. Logical Form and Grammar. New York: Routledge.Martin, Robert (ed.). (1984) Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox. Oxford: Clarendon.Perry, John. 1977. “The Problem of the Essential Indexical." Nous 13(1), pp. 3-21.Priest, Graham. 2006a. Doubt Truth to be a Liar. Oxford, New York. Carroll, Lewis. 2010. Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There. New York: Create Space Publications.Priest, Graham (2006b). “Logicians Setting Together Contradictories: A Perspective on Relevance, Paraconsistency, and Dialetheism.” In Jacquette, Dale. A Companion to Philosophical Logic. New York: Blackwell, pp. 651-664.Quine, W.V.0.1966. The Ways of Paradox. New York: Random House.Recanati, Francois. 1993. Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Blackwell, Oxford.Recanati, Francois. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Russell, Bertrand. 1902. “Letter to Frege.” In van Heijenoort, J. (Ed.) 124-125.Russell, Bertrand. 1903. Principles of Mathematics. New York: Norton.Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On Denoting. In: Martinich, A.P. (Ed.), The Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 203-211.Russell, Bertrand. 1908. Mathematical Logic as based on the theory of types in van Heijenoort. J. (Ed.). 1967:153- 182Russell, Bertrand. 1918. The philosophy of logical atomism. In: Marsh, R.C. (Ed.), Logic and Knowledge. Routledge, London, pp. 167-272.Salmon, Nathan. 2005. Metaphysics, Mathematics, and Meaning: Philosophical Papers I. Oxford University Press, New York.Searle, John. 1969. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Strawson, Peter. 1950. On Referring. In: Martinich, A.P. (Ed.), The Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 219-234.Van Heijenoort, Jean. (Ed.). 1967. From Frege to Godel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
